) interspersed
with diamond (
) and cross (
) note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
Alternate sections are marked Say and Play. The Say sections are spoken or sung to an improvised tune in a stentorian and condescending manner, as a traffic court judge lecturing a recidivist speeder. Read as though the text makes perfect sense, even though its grammar and meaning may make sudden, unexpected turns.
The Play sections use an ordinary five-line staff
with oval note heads () interspersed
with diamond () and cross () note heads. Play
in a manner that contrasts with the lecturer's attitude. Be mocking
or solicitous or calm or resigned or anything else appropriate.
) indicates some non-standard noise, like
a multiphonic or a strum behind the bridge or a dropped drumstick or a cheese-grater arpeggio or something else. Use your imagination.
) indicates a note that is one semitone (in either
direction) different from the preceding note.
You can play in concert with other performers, who may play other versions of this piece, or other any other materials, composed or improvised. When playing with others, the Say sections should be performed as disruptively as possible, and the Play sections should be played sensitively, with utmost regard to enhancing the performance of the other players.
Say: On what basis do you call it "crap"? Don't trot out the skill of the Blast! performance in London. Yet another name to add to the recording to refresh my memory about how the variation jumps from soloist to soloist or section to section or soloist to soloist or section to section or soloist to soloist or section to section or soloist to soloist or section to section. My reference to the Rachmaninoff "Rhapsody", and not as long as the famous Rachmaninoff piano work, with the piece, shows an interesting bias on your part.
Play:
Say: How ironic.
Play:
Say: That's a single instrument, not an orchestra. A single solo would be non sequitur, given your reference to the statement to which I'm responding were crossposted, such as yours, ironically.
Play:
Say: It has something to do that, because I have eliminated the possibility that it is the same kind of articles does Jim write?
Play:
Say: Note: no response.
Play:
Say: Now would you care to try for "how" or "why"?
Play:
Say: On what basis do you use the word "still"? I haven't started the script.
Play:
Say: That would be sufficient to justify the comparison, whereas you have your attributions confused.
Play:
Say: Irrelevant, given that I performed it. The title remains familiar, however, but the explanation is more likely because I have eliminated the possibility that it is "stupid".
Play:
Say: I already provided that information (and without anyone asking for it).
Play:
Say: I'd hardly call your pontification "evidence".
Play:
Say: Incorrect; the news reader had them sorted for me chrologically already, but I needed evidence to substantiate any of his music because "bands so bastardize it that orchestras will never play it on your acoustic piano?
Play:
Say: Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Play:
Say: Obviously not, as indicated in his footsteps, and so did Gordon Jacob.
Play:
Say: Yes you did; look at your other responses to me: Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:44:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:06:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:06:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:06:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:35:27 -0400 Now, let's look at the first place. Now, exactly who asked for information?
Play:
Say: The key word here is your point with regard to the statement to which I compared the *structure* to the rec.music.classical type.
Play:
Say: Evidence, please.
Play:
Say: That's your justification for calling another work "stupid"! You're internally inconsistent!
Play:
Say: Where is your interest in this newsgroup is about. Meanwhile, you've been able to come up with him, not me.
Play:
Say: I know what you wanted.
Play:
Say: Illogical, given that I've been discussing classical music, which is not apt. You have music to launch a personal attack, which is what this newsgroup and the much smaller level of traffic in this discussion?
Play:
Say: Well, that depends. If you look at what you consider to be "masterworks". I suggest that people aim their fire extinguisher at the base of the original Compact Disc format. Or the Mahler Eighth.
Play:
Say: What might that be?
Play:
Say: SWTHDTM?
Play:
Say: Yet more evidence that you could simply dismiss an answer in the title "symphony" to indicate length. Meanwhile, a "concerto for orchestra" does indicate that the visual aspect of the music schools here are turning out performers who are technically first-rate, but have no concept of ensemble.
Play:
Say: Missed too much of it by the Dallas Wind Symphony with Frederick Fennell conducting.
Play:
Say: There's at least some of the musicians might have for it.
Play:
Say: Yet another error in attribution.
Play:
Say: Where did the opposite of ignore me. You "baited" me, by your own postings before you demonstrate your hypocrisy any further.
Play:
Say: Witness the number of musicians sitting on the same melody over and over. It's a real challenge to play in tune? You shoot one of them.
Play: